On 03/28/2018 02:27 AM, [email protected] wrote:
From: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>

This file supports 8822be WiFi module with two physical antenna that
means one antenna will share with BT.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
  .../realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.c    | 5303 ++++++++++++++++++++
  .../realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.h    |  413 ++
  2 files changed, 5716 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.c
  create mode 100644 
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.h

--snip--

+/*anttenna control by bb mac bt antdiv pta to write 0x4c 0xcb4,0xcbd*/
+
+static
+void hallbtc882b1ant_set_ant_switch(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
+                                   bool force_exec, u8 ctrl_type,
+                                   u8 pos_type)
+{
+       struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = btcoexist->adapter;
+       bool switch_polatiry_inverse = false;
+       u8 regval_0xcbd = 0, regval_0x64;
+       u32 u32tmp1 = 0, u32tmp2 = 0, u32tmp3 = 0;
+
+       /* Ext switch buffer mux */
+       btcoexist->btc_write_1byte(btcoexist, 0x974, 0xff);
+       btcoexist->btc_write_1byte_bitmask(btcoexist, 0x1991, 0x3, 0x0);
+       btcoexist->btc_write_1byte_bitmask(btcoexist, 0xcbe, 0x8, 0x0);
+
+       if (!rfe_type->ext_ant_switch_exist)
+               return;
+
+       coex_dm->cur_ext_ant_switch_status = (ctrl_type << 8) + pos_type;
+
+       if (!force_exec) {
+               if (coex_dm->pre_ext_ant_switch_status ==
+                   coex_dm->cur_ext_ant_switch_status)
+                       return;
+       }
+
+       coex_dm->pre_ext_ant_switch_status = coex_dm->cur_ext_ant_switch_status;
+
+       /* swap control polarity if use different switch control polarity*/
+       /* Normal switch polarity for SPDT,
+        * 0xcbd[1:0] = 2b'01 => Ant to BTG, WLA
+        * 0xcbd[1:0] = 2b'10 => Ant to WLG
+        */
+       switch_polatiry_inverse = (rfe_type->ext_ant_switch_ctrl_polarity == 1 ?
+                                          ~switch_polatiry_inverse :
+                                          switch_polatiry_inverse);

gcc 7.3.1 reports the following:

  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.o
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.c: In function ‘hallbtc882b1ant_set_ant_switch’: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.c:2193:9: warning: ‘~’ on a boolean expression [-Wbool-operation]
         ~switch_polatiry_inverse :
         ^
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.c:2193:9: note: did you mean to use logical not?
         ~switch_polatiry_inverse :
         ^

For a boolean, you should use !bool, not -bool. In addition, it would be better to use switch_polarity_inverse, not switch_polatiry_inverse. The same "typo" happens in other places in this file. I suggest

sed -i 's/polatiry_inverse/polarity_inverse/g' \
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8822b1ant.c.

+
+       switch (pos_type) {

Larry

Reply via email to