On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 13:04 -0700, Peter Oh wrote:
> 
> On 05/07/2018 12:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 12:26 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > > From: Peter Oh <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > There is no meaning to call ieee80211_mesh_process_chnswitch
> > > without CSA IE provided, since the function will always return error.
> > 
> > I'm not convinced, an extended channel switch element might be present
> > instead?
> 
> I expected the comment. Yes, extended channel switch element could be 
> present instead of channel switch element which I missed to take care 
> of. So you can ignore the patch for now and I'll get back with right 
> patch for it.

Heh. Well, but then why bother at all? I mean, the inner function will
do the check and fail, and nothing will happen, so why bother?

johannes

Reply via email to