Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> writes: > Smatch complains that we should use the passed in "gfp" instead of hard > coding GFP_KERNEL. I looked at some of the callers and this would > probably be a bug for rtw_cfg80211_indicate_sta_disassoc() which uses > GFP_ATOMIC and a NULL "sinfo". > > Fixes: 52539ca89f36 ("cfg80211: Expose TXQ stats and parameters to userspace") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Ah, right, didn't notice that that was supposed to be a gfp value. Thanks for the fix :) Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> -Toke
