On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 11:43 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > - msg = nlmsg_new(100 + ft_event->ric_ies_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + msg = nlmsg_new(100 + ft_event->ies_len + ft_event->ric_ies_len,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!msg)
> > return;
> should these really be nla_total_size(ft_event->ies_len) +
> nla_total_size(ft_event->ric_ies_len) to properly account for the NLA
> header + padding? or do we consider that to be noise captured by the
We do, technically we should have something like nla_total_size() of
various things including all those wiphy, ifindex, MAC attributes etc.
so we just get lazy...