On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 11:43 +0530, Tamizh chelvam wrote:
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h
> > > @@ -1249,6 +1249,7 @@ enum nl80211_commands {
> > > NL80211_CMD_CONTROL_PORT_FRAME,
> > >
> > > NL80211_CMD_SET_STA_MON,
> > > + NL80211_CMD_NOTIFY_STA_MON,
> >
> > Missing documentation - but again, why not unify it with the existing
> > event? Or can't we because that might confuse older applications?
> > Perhaps anyway we should unicast these notifications? Not sure though,
> > perhaps one app could set them up and the other might care?
> >
>
> This new command introduced as per the previous discussion
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10168685/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10240697/
>
> Is my understanding correct ?
I guess you're right. To my defense, this was like almost half a year
ago :)
> I just referred this code from cfg80211_prepare_cqm. Do you want me to
> change this to struct based?
Please, I guess we can fix up cqm too later.
johannes
