On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
>
> Pointer arithmetic already adjusts by the size of the struct,
> so the sizeof() calculation is wrong. This is basically the
> same as Colin King's patch for similar code in the iwlwifi
> driver.
>
> Fixes: 230ebaa189af ("cfg80211: read wmm rules from regulatory database")
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/wireless/reg.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
> index 4fc66a117b7d..283902974fbf 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/reg.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
> @@ -452,8 +452,7 @@ reg_copy_regd(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *src_regd)
> continue;
>
> regd->reg_rules[i].wmm_rule = d_wmm +
> - (src_regd->reg_rules[i].wmm_rule - s_wmm) /
> - sizeof(struct ieee80211_wmm_rule);
> + (src_regd->reg_rules[i].wmm_rule - s_wmm);
> }
> return regd;
> }
As side note those pointer aritmetics related with rule->wmm_rule is
really involuted in various places in reg.c . Seems would be better to
just make wmm_rule part of iee80211_reg_rule structure like this:
struct ieee80211_reg_rule {
struct ieee80211_freq_range freq_range;
struct ieee80211_power_rule power_rule;
struct ieee80211_wmm_rule wmm_rule;
u32 flags;
u32 dfs_cac_ms;
};
and use a flag to intdicate wmm_rule is valid. There should be no
big memory overhead sice there are only few reg_rules for the regdomain.
Or I'm wrong?
Regards
Stanislaw
