On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:40 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > > > Guess we'll have to deal with everything else if we ever move management > > frames onto the TXQ path as well... > > Depends on whether we care for management frame priorities or not ... so > far we haven't really.
Actually, for the most part we have implemented that properly. Except for the TXQ I added for bufferable management ... oh well, I think we're the only user thereof now. I'm not sure we want to have a TXQ per TID for management, that seems overkill. But I'm also not sure how to solve this otherwise ... johannes
