Hi Stanislaw,

On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 01:56:08PM +0200,  Gruszka wrote:
> Register 66 was causing issues on RT6352 if set to the same value as
> in MTK driver. With 1c reg value device was working fine in both HT20
> and HT40 modes.

My guess is that this may change once we add proper TSSI which involes
parts of AGC init as well. I suggest to add a comment in the code to
reflect that.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomislav Požega <pozega.tomis...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgrus...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> index 1a2bf6c49b82..3a04eaef8511 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> @@ -3981,11 +3981,7 @@ static void rt2800_config_channel(struct rt2x00_dev 
> *rt2x00dev,
>               rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 196, reg);
>  
>               /* AGC init */
> -             if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352))
> -                     reg = 0x04;
> -             else
> -                     reg = rf->channel <= 14 ? 0x1c : 0x24;
> -
> +             reg = rf->channel <= 14 ? 0x1c : 0x24;
>               reg += 2 * rt2x00dev->lna_gain;

We can summerize the two lines into
                reg = 0x1c + (2 * rt2x00dev->lna_gain);
which is also what is was before introducing support for MT7620.


>               rt2800_bbp_write_with_rx_chain(rt2x00dev, 66, reg);


Cheers


Daniel

Reply via email to