Hi Arend, On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:11 PM Arend Van Spriel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does it mean there is a regression in 4.20 for this board? I haven't tested it with 4.20 yet. >> Only change I needed was the one suggested by Arend in the nvram file: >> changed boardflags3 entry.from 0x08101188 to 0x101188. > > > Yes. That is understood. However, an external LPO clock may be more reliable > than using the internal, which is consequence of changing boardflags3. Just to make sure I understand the change: boardflags3 0x08101188 --> Wifi uses an external clock boardflags3 0x101188 ---> Wifi uses an internal clock Current dts does not output the 32kHz from MX7D to the Wifi chip, so I guess the below is correct. > So can the signal be measured with a scope to confirm it provides 32kHz? I am not sure if I can access this signal via scope. Thanks
