Siva Rebbagondla <[email protected]> writes:
> From: Siva Rebbagondla <[email protected]>
>
> As we missed to detach HCI, while entering power off or hibernation,
> an extra hci interface gets created whenever system is woken up, to
> avoid this we added hci_detach() in rsi_disconnect(), rsi_freeze(),
> and rsi_shutdown() functions which are invoked for these tests.
> This patch fixes the issue
>
> Signed-off-by: Siva Rebbagondla <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> index b412b65e..59ff778 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> @@ -1131,7 +1131,12 @@ static void rsi_disconnect(struct sdio_func *pfunction)
>
> rsi_mac80211_detach(adapter);
> mdelay(10);
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RSI_COEX
> + if (adapter->priv->coex_mode > 1 && adapter->priv->bt_adapter) {
> + rsi_bt_ops.detach(adapter->priv->bt_adapter);
> + adapter->priv->bt_adapter = NULL;
> + }
> +#endif
Ifdefs are ugly, avoid them as much as possible. Would this work:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RSI_COEX) &&
adapter->priv->coex_mode > 1 &&
adapter->priv->bt_adapter)
BTW, why do you need the ifdef anyway, isn't it enough to check for
coex_mode?
--
Kalle Valo
