Hi,

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:21:20PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]>
> 
> Update efuse table layout as the document released.
> From the newest released document, 8822c has RFE type 1 and type 2.
> Without adding RFE 1 and 2 the user's efuse-programed chips will failed
> to pass the chip info check and cannot power on hardware.
> And 8822c has only 512 bytes for physical efuse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 12 ++----
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.h | 53 
> ++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
> index 71f2af0..5c06e32 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c

> @@ -1137,7 +1133,7 @@ struct rtw_chip_info rtw8822c_hw_spec = {
>       .tx_buf_desc_sz = 16,
>       .rx_pkt_desc_sz = 24,
>       .rx_buf_desc_sz = 8,
> -     .phy_efuse_size = 1024,
> +     .phy_efuse_size = 512,

I realized that technically, I'm blaming your memory errors (writing
past the phy efuse buffer) on the original patchset, when you really
create the error here, when you shrink phy_efuse_size.

Regardless, the original series should be fixed to do better bounds
checking or to stop accessing a fixed value beyond 512 anyway.

Brian

>       .log_efuse_size = 768,
>       .ptct_efuse_size = 124,
>       .txff_size = 262144,
 

Reply via email to