> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:08:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Grab rx_page_lock in mt76u_refill_rx allocating rx buffer for 'legacy'
> > mode. Remove gfp from mt76u_refill_rx signature since we need to
> > use GFP_ATOMIC
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
> 
> I'm doing some cleanup/optimization work which amongs other things
> will remove rx_page_lock. Please drop this patch.

Oh, ok. IIRC we need rx_page_lock to fix this:
481bb0432414f790066205fe77226b7d1877385d. Is it still necessary?
Moreover maybe we need this patch for 5.1 since net-next is almost close, no?

@Felix: are you planning to submit other patches for 5.1?

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Stanislaw

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to