On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 08:35 +0000, Sergey Matyukevich wrote: > Indeed, it is PI. I should have known. But instead I spent some time > digging through 802.11 specs :)
Oops :) > Well, as I mentioned in my question, regulatory update/reset operations > shall be completed in ~pi seconds for _all_ the wireless cards in the > system. In our case, regulatory reset operation may be fairly costly. > As a result, we end up with recurring reset timeout, when more than one > qtn card is installed in a single pcie host. One option for us is to > optimize regulatory reset operations in firmware. > > But what do you think about converting crda_timeout into a per-wiphy > timeout in the case when all wiphy-s are being processed, e.g. > in update_all_wiphy_regulatory. Maybe we should parallelize it? But I don't know how easy that would be. I'm a little worried just making it longer will cause users to really be wondering what's going on? johannes
