<[email protected]> writes: > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]> > > The new rssi_level should be stored in si, otherwise the rssi_level will > never be updated and get a wrong RA mask, which is calculated by the > rssi level > > Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]>
Stanislaw suggested that this should go to 5.2. So what breaks from user's point of view if this is not applied? -- Kalle Valo
