[Re: v5.2.x - stable updates comprising v5.2.33] On 27/02/2020 (Thu 14:40) 
Bruce Ashfield wrote:

> In message: v5.2.x - stable updates comprising v5.2.33
> on 25/02/2020 Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> 
> > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
> > 
> > Here is the next 5.2.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
> > the Yocto project, as the 12th v5.2.x post-EOL release.
> > 
> > This release is the 2nd in monitoring the v5.4.x content since the v5.3.18
> > kernel was the last in the v5.3.x series.  As mentioned in the previous
> > release notes, the v5.4.7 release had a hefty 433 commits to consider!
> > 
> > But since we are now using 5.4.x content as possible candidates for this
> > 5.2.x extension, there will be (as I mentioned before?) more than 2x the
> > 5.3+ and 5.4+ content not appropriate for this v5.2 -- and this release
> > bears that out -- as I'm left with about 335 appropriate commits for our
> > v5.2 after I do backporting, and Fixes: revision lookups and multi-arch
> > build testing -- so, a larger "not appropriate" percentage than before...
> > 
> > Anyway, I don't think that should concern anybody, but just a passing
> > note on the numbers, in case anyone out there is interested in that.
> > 
> > As always, there is the repo below with all the details of what was
> > rejected and what was used - starting from the raw import point.
> > 
> > I've put this 5.2.33 queue through the usual testing; build testing on
> > x86-64/32, ARM-64/32, PPC and MIPS, plus some static analysis and
> > finally some sanity runtime tests on x86-64.
> > 
> > I did the signed tag just as per the previously released versions.
> > Please find a signed v5.2.33 tag using this key:
> > 
> > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xEBCE84042C07D1D6
> > 
> > in the repo in the kernel.org directory here:
> > 
> >   
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux-5.2.y.git/?h=linux-5.2.y
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux-5.2.y.git
> 
> As usual, I had a conflict in -rt:
> 
>         both modified:   arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c

The above was just a case of upstream df4393424af changing irq --> IRQ
in a comment.  Nothing to worry about there.

>         both modified:   lib/ubsan.c

This one is from the backport of 9a50dcaf0416 (adding a classic "goto
out" unwind) that is running into the local yocto-rt commit ID:

commit 7adf9cbf1caa216652dfe7058477bb4fe420ea16
Author: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Sep 20 11:08:35 2019 +0100

    lib/ubsan: Don't seralize UBSAN report

...which removes "flags" from ubsan_prologue() args.  Knowing that, and
looking at your merge resolution in 876c748613 -- I think we are good.

> I resolved it locally, but if you can have a look at it, I'd appreciate
> any fixups that are required.
> 
> I did build and boot -rt, so it is minimally sane :D

Yep, I think things are good as-is; no fixups needed.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> Bruce
>               
> 
> > 
> > for merge to standard/base in linux-yocto-5.2 and then out from there
> > into the other base and BSP branches.
> > 
> > For those who are interested, the evolution of the commits is here:
> > 
> >   https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/longterm-queue-5.2.git/
> > 
> > This repo isn't needed for anything; it just exists for transparency and
> > so people can see the evolution of the raw commits that were originally
> > selected to create this 5.2.x release.
> > 
> > Paul.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8419): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8419
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/71528711/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to