In message: Trial merge of v5.15.111 v6.1.28 for linux-yocto
on 12/05/2023 Kevin Hao wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
> 
> This is a trial merge of the stable kernel v5.15.111 v6.1.28 for the 
> following branches in the linux-yocto.
>   443f96dec14c  v5.15/standard/sdkv5.10/axxia
>   541ee58e54e0  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv5.10/axxia                      
>    #Have conflicts
>   508a4e703a79  v5.15/standard/base
>   168834cde529  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/base                                
>    #Have conflicts
>   7f137c507774  v5.15/standard/cn-sdkv5.4/octeon
>   b491324b85ba  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.4/octeon                   
>    #Have conflicts
>   2dd232ba6ce7  v5.15/standard/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon
>   fd6c28f7b390  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/cn-sdkv5.15/octeon                  
>    #Have conflicts
>   76ae3a0f2a73  v5.15/standard/ti-sdk-5.10/ti-j72xx                           
>    #Have conflicts
>   9119f3f87a61  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/ti-sdk-5.10/ti-j72xx                
>    #Have conflicts
>   26cdaccd602c  v5.15/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-soc
>   f127c78e0cf0  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-soc                
>    #Have conflicts
>   7eee2cb35e49  v5.15/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi
>   a842cf4e4675  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi                        
>    #Have conflicts
>   51149dacd7c4  v5.15/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   f36ddc08df68  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g               
>    #Have conflicts
>   fbb655cba3b2  v5.15/standard/intel-sdk-5.15/intel-socfpga
>   c421ea83b1ba  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/intel-sdk-5.15/intel-socfpga        
>    #Have conflicts
>   8f23e04e29ba  v5.15/standard/x86
>   95d135df2110  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/x86                                 
>    #Have conflicts
>   5492ac82859e  v5.15/standard/sdkv5.15/xlnx-soc                              
>    #Have conflicts
>   4dd6efc6a43b  v5.15/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv5.15/xlnx-soc                   
>    #Have conflicts
>   3caa8770fbc2  v6.1/standard/base
>   8886ff2350fe  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/base
>   fe915ec2426e  v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc                             
>    #Have conflicts
>   79624711ef7d  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-6.1/nxp-soc                  
>    #Have conflicts
>   f9964998b8ea  v6.1/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi                                    
>    #Have conflicts
>   f6916595380e  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/bcm-2xxx-rpi                         
>    #Have conflicts
>   a536e2acc87b  v6.1/standard/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   b0c530beaf73  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/nxp-sdk-5.15/nxp-s32g
>   3caa8770fbc2  v6.1/standard/x86
>   4e11d1d2ffce  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/x86
>   8fbef12438f5  v6.1/standard/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc                                
>    #Have conflicts
>   7f80b171fa27  v6.1/standard/preempt-rt/sdkv6.1/xlnx-soc                     
>    #Have conflicts
> 
> This is a much bigger stable cycle. There are 372 patches in v5.15.111 and 
> 611 patches in v6.1.28.
> So we got more merge conflicts than usual. There is one merge conflict in 
> kernel/workqueue.c on
> v5.15 rt kernel, all the others are for various drivers. I believe I have 
> fixed all the mess and 
> all the merges have passed my build test. I have pushed these branches to:
>     https://github.com/haokexin/linux
> 
> You can use this as a reference for the linux-yocto stable kernel bump.

Thanks Kevin,

I did reference the changes in quite a few occasions, and also
cross referenced against upstream -rt for the workqueue issue.

The BSP resolutions are definitely helpful. I'm still perfecting
the workflow (and my scripts) to reference the changes more easily,
so hopefully relatively few issues crept into my merges.

Bruce

> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12552): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/12552
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/98841823/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/leave/6687884/21656/624485779/xyzzy
 [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to