On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:55:19AM +0800, Xulin Sun via lists.yoctoproject.org 
wrote:
> Xulin Sun (11):
>       media: platform: vxe-vxd: align with ti-linux-5.10.y branch

Aren't all the patches based on the ti-linux-5.10.y now?

>       Revert "net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-switchdev: adjust to 5.10"
>       net: update the AF_MAX value to the latest

We should fold this fix into the SDK patch which introduce this issue.

>       PCI: j721e: disable retrain Link for Gen2 training
>       net: ethernet: ti: j721e-cpsw-virt-mac: add the check whether it's own
> device
>       Revert "media: ti-vpe: cal: add multiplexed streams support"
>       Revert "v4l: subdev: add routing & stream config to v4l2_subdev_state"
>       Revert "v4l: subdev: Add [GS]_ROUTING subdev ioctls and operations"
>       i2c: core: correct the wrong exit path in function
> 'i2c_new_client_device'
>       arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: enable RNG feature
>       drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: correct wrong macro and undeclared variable

We should fold this fix into the SDK patch which introduce this issue.

For the revert patches, could we just delete them directly?

>  net/Kconfig |     1 +
>  net/Makefile |     1 +
>  net/core/dev_ioctl.c |     7 +
>  net/core/skbuff.c |     8 +
>  net/core/sock.c |    16 +-
>  net/ethtool/common.c |     1 +
>  net/ethtool/ioctl.c |     3 +-

The changes for these net core files seem suspicious, some of the patches are 
even
marked as HACK. Do we really need them?

>  net/hsr/Makefile |     1 +
>  net/hsr/hsr_debugfs.c |   107 +-
>  net/hsr/hsr_device.c |   459 +-
>  net/hsr/hsr_device.h |     5 +-
>  net/hsr/hsr_forward.c |   331 +-
>  net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h |     4 +
>  net/hsr/hsr_main.h |   100 +-
>  net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c |    39 +-
>  net/hsr/hsr_proc.c |   673 ++
>  net/hsr/hsr_slave.c |    23 +-

Which component will depend on these changes?

>  net/rpmsg/Kconfig |    19 +
>  net/rpmsg/Makefile |     2 +
>  net/rpmsg/rpmsg_proto.c |   745 ++
>  net/socket.c |    28 +

Are there userspace applications to use this new protocol?

Thanks,
Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12617): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/12617
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/98939750/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to