> -----Original Message----- > From: Hart, Darren > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:34 PM > To: Kamble, Nitin A; Ashfield, Bruce (Wind River); linux- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] a fix for v3.10 LTSI branch > > On 3/31/14, 13:24, "Kamble, Nitin A" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > > > >I was noticing emenlow BSP failing to boot since LTSI was integrated in > >the v3.10 kernel. After debugging I found out that kernel code was > >doing an invalid memory access, causing kernel panic. > > Here is the fix for the issue, which I am also pushing to the > >upstream > >v3.10 LTSI kernel repository. > > Is this a backport from mainline? If so, it needs the cherry-pick ID. If not, > this > needs to go upstream first and then back to 3.10 stable (which LTSI will pick > up). If neither of these seems like the right approach to you - what did you > have in mind and why?
This is not a backport. But I am planning to send it to LTSI upstream. As you say this will be back ported, once it goes upstream in the LTSI repo. Nitin > > Thanks, > > -- > Darren Hart > Yocto Project - Linux Kernel > Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -- _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
