On 5/13/14, 9:29, "Bruce Ashfield" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 14-05-13 12:11 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> A number of incremental fixes have been made upstream and in >>linux-next. There >> are a couple still under review, but which are functional and useful. >>All >> non-mainline patches are annotated as such in the commit message, but >>for >> reference, the top 7 patches are not yet in mainline: >> >> d0047ab acpi_lpss: Add Bay Trail pinctrl HID >> 97d42f9 spi/pxa2xx: Add common clock framework support in PCI glue layer >> ac5ccf2 clkdev: Export clk_register_clkdev >> 6d381c2 pwm: lpss: Fix const qualifier and sparse warnings >> e4a7de2 pwm: lpss: Add support for PCI devices >> e2eb8ab drm/i915/vlv: reset VLV media force wake request register >> f695f17 spi/pxa2xx-pci: Add PCI mode support for BayTrail LPSS SPI >> >> Of those, the top three are still undergoing review, and only: >> >> 97d42f9 spi/pxa2xx: Add common clock framework support in PCI glue layer >> >> Adds any new functionality. It has received considerable review and >>should be >> close to acceptance. It is required to use the SPI device when >>enumerated as PCI >> on Baytrail platforms. > >I can live with the above. > >> >> From a high level, this series accomplishes the following: >> * Fix MMC in ACPI mode >> * Enable PCI mode for SPI and PWM >> * Fix an i915 initialization hang when no display is connected at boot > >excellent. > >> >> >> The following changes since commit >>b0b9c962ea01f9356fc1542b9696ebe4a38e196a: >> >> Merge tag 'v3.14.2' into standard/base (2014-04-28 23:52:14 -0400) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> >> git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.14 dvhart/standard/minnowmax >> >>http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-3.14/log/?h=dvhart/stand >>ard/minnowmax >> > >And to confirm .. you do want this on a minnowmax "holding zone" branch ? Blarg, I missed that rather critical point. Given that this is pretty much all ready to go, I'd prefer this goes to standard/base. If we don't want anything on standard/base that isn't a mainline backport, then we should discuss a standard/intel branch as this is intel-common material, and not necessarily BSP specific. -- Darren Hart Open Source Technology Center [email protected] Intel Corporation -- _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
