On 7/5/15, 8:50 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>Bruce, any preference? I think we need a couple of READMEs in the > >No strong preference. The current structure has been needs driven >and gets refactored as new fragments and use cases are added. > >No objection to the above proposal. With the only caution that I'd >prefer to not get too deep in the directory structure, or have really >small fragments. But we can cross that bridge if we get there. > >>kernel-cache hierarchy (cfg, features, ktype, etc. to help guide folks > >I swear we created something like this before .. but I can't find it at >the moment. > >This is a good idea, what about a low priority bugilla case ? .. something >I can handle in the later sprints for the fall release. Agreed, that would be the best way to handle it. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
