As stated in commit 5d5d56897530 ("make new_sync_{read,write}() static"),
we shouldn't use new_sync_{read_write} for ->read/->write. We should
NULL ->read/->write with non-NULL ->{read,write}_iter will do the
right thing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <kexin....@windriver.com>
---
fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
index fbbf313..0a3e9da 100644
--- a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
+++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_vfs.c
@@ -794,8 +794,6 @@ static int yaffs_sync_object(struct file *file, struct
dentry *dentry,
#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 22))
static const struct file_operations yaffs_file_operations = {
- .read = new_sync_read,
- .write = new_sync_write,
.read_iter = generic_file_read_iter,
.write_iter = generic_file_write_iter,
.mmap = generic_file_mmap,
--
1.9.1
--
_______________________________________________
linux-yocto mailing list
linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
