From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 01:41:39 +0400

> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:17:14PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wed,  5 Aug 2009 11:28:16 +0400
>> 
>> > Provide dummt get/setsockopt implementations to stop these
>> > syscalls from oopsing on our sockets.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>
>> 
>> See "sock_no_getsockopt()" and "sock_no_setsockopt()" which are
>> provided specifically for this situation.
> 
> There functions are to be used in struct proto_ops and not in the
> struct proto. I'd like to use sock_common_get/setsockopt() from the
> beginning, as there will be sockopts at least for dgram protocols.

Ok, my bad.  The patch is fine.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to