Hello, I'm currently playing with the 6lowpan code and was wondering if the fragmentation support is supposed to be operational. The reason I ask is because when my packets grow too big (when fragmentation should kick in), my communications stop working. I sniffed the traffic with Wireshark, and found out the first fragment (FRAG1) is always 25 bytes long and does not contain any payload. A quick look at the code seems to confirm that the first fragment carries no payload (see lowpan_skb_fragmentation()). I fail to see where RFC 4944 indicates that the first fragment should be empty (and I fail to see what would be the benefit of this behavior anyway). So, is that the intended behavior? Did I miss something?
Either way, I'll look more into it, maybe this is only specific to my system (I ported the serial driver and applied some patches to it, so the packets might be mangled somewhere else). Thank you in advance. Regards, Tony ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
