Hi Werner, On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 05:11:52PM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Alexander Aring wrote: > > maybe it is better to preserve the current design of platform_data handling > > on. > > Yeah, I thought we don't actually need the copying in at86rf230_fill_data > since we don't change the values obtained from the platform data, but > then, platform data could be initdata and thus become unavailable later > on. > > Thanks for catching this one ! Fix coming soon. >
Yes, it can be unavailable later. > > I was thinking about to add a union for 'int rstn' and the function_pointer, > > then we can set a gpio rstn xor reset handler, but this will make some > > overhead in the implementation... > > If you really want to squeeze out the last few bytes, reset_data and > rstn could share a union. But that's probably not worth the ugliness. > agree, this one looks good. :-) Regards Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
