David Miller wrote: > You're submitting 7 patches, one set is numbered 1-6 and this > one has no number.
The unnumbered patch is independent from the rest. But yes, he shouldn't have sent it in the same thread. To provide a bit of context, 6LoWPAN support in the kernel is currently in an embarrassingly badly broken state. On a good day, you can get ping to an RFC-compliant peer to work, sometimes even both ways, but only as long as you use link-local addresses and keep the payload small. Beyond that, it's all bugland. Alexander thus started to fix the 6LoWPAN issues he and others, myself included, had bumped into. It's a lot of changes for a relatively small file (6lowpan.c) and later on he'll have at least one more batch for fragmentation, but when all that is done, we'll finally have a stack that can actually do real work. Alexander, since you'll have to re-submit anyway, you may want to add a Reviewed-by: Werner Almesberger <wer...@almesberger.net> to all the patches. - Werner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
