Hello, On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Werner Almesberger <wer...@almesberger.net> wrote: > Roncsák Tamás wrote: >> I would like to know whether AT86RF232B is supported? > > So far, it isnt't. It looks quite similar to the AT86RF230 family > (now grown to no less than four members), so it may not be overly > difficult to adapt the AT86RF23x driver.
As far as I remember rf212, main difference was in channel setup registers. So you would have to: 1) Add a case to switch (lp->part) in at86rf230_probe() function 2) Change at86rf230_channel to differentiate behavior depending on lp->part value (current code works for rf230/1, you need to add code for rf212). As far as I remember this should be enough. >> So my question is AT86RF212B planned to be supported or >> or it is out of the scope? > > As Alexander has hinted, the scope of the project is mainly > determined by what people contribute :-) So please don't forget a patch/questions to this ML, enabling support for additional chips would be easy topic and good contribution. -- With best wishes Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
