On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty wrote: > I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple years ago and the version in > there implements draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06; we were able to interop with > Contiki implementation of the same but I imagine the world has moved > forward since then... > > Steve >
Then I understand the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) isn't rfc complaint? Yes, draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06 isn't up-to-date anymore, we are already rfc6282 complaint. If TinyOS 6lowpan stack isn't rfc complaint I would not use it anymore. I googled a little bit and found this [1]. It's really implemented draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06 and I thought only the linux implementation was outdated. :D And I think BLIP 2.0 is the current version. [1] http://tinyos.stanford.edu/tinyos-wiki/index.php/BLIP_2.0 - Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
