On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:26:09AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> Can I resubmit this patch with just the code to handle the reserved dest mode 
> as this is effecting us?  Leave the other part to later when the coordinator 
> functionality is in place.

yes simple drop the frames with a reserved address type. That's okay but
I also missed a check on support frame types. Currenlty I make a global
view of others implementation and what we have, then think about a
"maybe" better solution for mac802154.

> And if so do you want a warning message and if so does anyone know how to 
> ratelimit them using netdev_warn?

No, if you get many of these packets and it's occur randomly we should
not print anything. A printout cost time, maybe a debug printout which
is available only at compiletime or runtime. Of course we should
increase the drop count, but this is missed at so many places we should
think about a global solution for this.

- Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to