On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:07:09AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > >From what I can read from 4944 you should be allowed to receive 
> > >uncompressed IPv6 packets that have a 6lowpan fragmentation header which I 
> > >don't think we currently do. 
> > I have a patch waiting to allow this but was wondering if I am right in 
> > this assumption.
> > 
> 
> can you please cite the necessary part of information from rfc4944? Then
> I can take a look.
> 
> 
> What I know is:
> 
> We have a dispatch value which allow to receive uncompressed IPv6
> packets. This could we use if the compression isn't necessary and the
> whole IPv6 packet fits into 127 MTU inclusive mac header, then
> compression makes no sense.

Ah, and compressed header in fragmentation makes always sense because it
doesn't fit into the 127 MTU. :)

- Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to