Hi Martin, On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:53:53AM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: ... > > I know this issue and we should not do that in this way. > > Why? > > Because this works only for fragmentation with IPHC, for example if we > support mesh or Broadcast or HC1 compression. We should call after > successfully reassembled "means lowpan_frag_rcv returns 1" the lowpan_rcv > again. > So this is a recursion and we don't should use recursion to much, but it > should only be one recursion, so I think that's okay. :-) >
I reconsider about that, this is not okay. A attacker can send data to occur this stack overflow... We need another solution for this. Maybe your current one, but handling fragmentation at the beginning and then evaulate dispatch values. - Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
