Hi Alex,
On the lowpan_give_skb_to_devices change.
As we are iterating over a list of lowpan_devices and could potentially copy
the skb more than once, what happens if the first device returns NET_RX_DROP
and then the second time it return NET_RX_SUCCESS? The stat variable is
overwritten so stat only ever reflects the return value of netif_rx for the
last device?
Maybe it's better to completely remove the if else at the end and always
consume the skb? For the case whereskb_copy fails then we should kfree_skb,
e.g.
static int lowpan_give_skb_to_devices(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *dev)
{
struct lowpan_dev_record *entry;
struct sk_buff *skb_cp;
int stat = NET_RX_SUCCESS;
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &lowpan_devices, list)
if (lowpan_dev_info(entry->ldev)->real_dev == skb->dev) {
skb_cp = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb_cp) {
kfree_skb(skb);
rcu_read_unlock();
return NET_RX_DROP;
}
skb_cp->dev = entry->ldev;
stat = netif_rx(skb_cp);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
consume_skb(skb);
return stat;
}
what are your thoughts?
-Martin.
On 16/09/14 07:57, Alexander Aring wrote:
>
> --- snap
>
> Ignore the below one, I will only note about this... that we don't
> forget that.
>
> This code should be a generic function for increasing headroom for
> decompressing headers (IPv6, next hdr's). Still issues with
> consume_skb/kfree_skb here.
>
>
> + if (stat < 0) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + stat = NET_RX_DROP;
> + } else {
> + consume_skb(skb);
> + }
> This basically works now, but it confuse developers.
>
> Look how stat is initzialed.
> There is mixed errno and NET_RX_FOO handling here. Which is part of the
> complete error handling mess. And correct freeing of skb's required a
> correct error handling.
>
> The function looks now like this:
>
> struct lowpan_dev_record *entry;
> struct sk_buff *skb_cp;
> int stat = NET_RX_SUCCESS;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &lowpan_devices, list)
> if (lowpan_dev_info(entry->ldev)->real_dev == skb->dev) {
> skb_cp = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!skb_cp) {
> stat = -ENOMEM;
> Simple assign stat = NET_RX_DROP.
> break;
> }
>
> skb_cp->dev = entry->ldev;
> stat = netif_rx(skb_cp);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> if (stat < 0) {
> remove brackets and check on NET_RX_DROP. or vice versa.
> kfree_skb(skb);
> stat = NET_RX_DROP;
> } else {
> consume_skb(skb);
> }
> return stat;
>
> Now if the list is empty we check if (stat < 0) with a NET_RX_FOO stuff,
> we should avoid that. I mean the current situation is because somebody
> mixed this stuff and that's why we have this now.
>
> Another developers look of some code (that's what I did) and see, aaah
> returning NET_RX_FOO so we can check on it, but at this situation he
> need to think a little bit more what it is the correct handline because
> there is still some errno conversion.
>
>> return stat;
>> }
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
