On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:39:11PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > On 16/09/14 12:36, Alexander Aring wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:01:59PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: ... > > and this also smells like side effects for me, because we have the > local_skb which is sometimes freed inside of lowpan_process_data and > returning skb. Then we don't know which we should kfree_skb now, the skb > or local_skb now. Need to thing more about this to offer some solution, > somebody agree here with me? >
I mean sometimes we do this *skb = *new and skb is the parameter and before we did a consume_skb(skb); then local_skb is already freed after this and returning an errno and we make kfree_skb(local_skb) will crash something, I suppose. - Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
