On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Roberto A. Foglietta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, 900 and 701 share the same case.
> It is 901 which is 10% bigger and heavier but it lasts 7h instead 3.5h!!!
Ya, 901 rides Atom proc whereas 900 is powered by an old Celeron M.
Are you sure you want a 900 ?
> I would have a 18" fold-able which I can decide to use as 18", 9" or
> 4.5" depending the occasion, don't you?
> ;-)
18" no.... not mobile enough => I prefer a desktop with >20" screen. I
have one station for dev, games, and so on.
14"/15"... good ratio. Comfortable enough to work with, and easy to
carry on trips, in hotel and so on. I have one.
10"... the one you wanna start very quickly to check weather, the one
you want to cook with to read recipes, the one to read mail/news/irc
on the sofa, not to launch eclipse and spend an hour on dev. I
currently miss it. And feel pain to start my 15" just to spend half a
minute on the web.
7"... to use with external screen and move it very often or when
special mobility needs require me to hurt my eyes. Very special needs
that I don't have today.
> Italian girlfriend have big bags!!!
> :-D
You got the point :)
N1c0
Diffusez cette liste aupres de vos relations :)
Linux Azur : http://linux-azur.org
L'auteur du post est responsable de ses écrits !
*** Pas de message SMS, HTML ni de PJ SVP ***
