3mpty schrieb: >> Target address range is 0x22000000 to 0x2203fff (SRAM) > > The second number is 0x22003FFF or 0x2203FFF0? A digit is missing (am I > wrong?) 0x2203FFFF, or rather a little below since our shellcode will have a nop zone of 2KB
> > Well, there's a problem if the address start with 0x2200 because, > yeah, this is the code for "... and this will stop the parsing of the > link and so the shellcode doesn't get copied into memory and won't > cause the overflow (even if I'm not sure of this). 0x22 at the addresses where we need it (odd ones) will not hurt in unicode. _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
