Scott Klement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> True, /bin/sh is not bash on FreeBSD. However, I wasn't having the
> problem that Carey was describing....
It's quite possible that the *BSD sh has been improved since someone
from Debian ported it to Linux and called it "ash", more than three
years ago:
} This is a very simple port of ash taken from NetBSD-current on
} 1997/06/18. The file setmode.c was taken from src/libc/gen and is
} needed since the Linux libc does provide getmode(3) or setmode(3).
} History editing is disabled to avoid code bloat. This also means that
} building the package is possible without the BSD libedit.
The man page looks just the same as the NetBSD sh(1) man page I found
online, though.
--
Carey Evans http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/
+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To subscribe to this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+---
