Since Dave McKenzie's cursor positioning patches were incorporated back in
october, I have had absolutely no cursor positioning problems. None
whatsoever.
Of course, I'm running the development version, not 0.16.0. (IMHO, the
development version is a whole lot more stable!)
Maybe someone could inspect the difference in how the cursor positioning
works between version 0.16.0 and the current development sources??
-S
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Jason M. Felice wrote:
>
> These are difficult to get right. I suspect that some of the fixes
> recently submitted undid previous cursor positioning fixes.
>
> I just inspected the code, and the logic for cursor positioning is
> pretty sophisticated (read: appropriately complicated for speaking an
> IBM protocol *grin*). There *is* code there to handle all of the odd
> cases, so it's that something is broken rather than unimplemented.
>
> Can I get a couple of tracelogs here, with descriptions of where the
> cursor should end up? (email directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - don't
> spam the list).
> Remember, tracelogs contain your login password, so don't send it if you
> aren't comfortable with that (or make a temporary user or something).
>
> -Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To subscribe to this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+---
