"Jason M. Felice" wrote:
>
> Sheesh, ignore the list for a few days, and a lot of stuff piles up.
>
> Okay, let me see if I get this all straight:
>
Just so I don't get blamed later for suggesting things...
> 1) Enter should be valid in an FER field.
> 2) Arrow keys should be valid in an FER field, and the arrow keys should
> be handled instead of just
> turning off the FER indicator.
Yes to 1 and 2
> 3) '+' should be valid in a numeric FER field when the FER indicator is
> on, since this is the only
> way to do a Field+ from a standard terminal. '-' should be as well,
> while I'm at it.
Probably, but I do NOT have a numeric FER field, so this isn't mine. In
a character FER field, Field+ should act like Field Exit. Field-
doesn't work on the real terminal, but shouldn't hurt anything if it did
work (speculation, of course.) Also, I've only tested with a 1
character field, so longer fields MAY exhibit different behaviour.
> 4) Need a direct keyboard mapping for Field+. Note that Field+ and
> Field Enter behave differently -
> Field Enter does not change the sign of a number-only field (a
> numeric field with a separate sign
> position).
Well.... Field exit should clear the sign also. I don't know if that
agrees with the specs or not, but that's how it works in real life. (If
anyone disagrees, please send me DDS to demonstrate so I can try it on
real terminals.)
> 5) Issue with Field- always appending a '}'.
<snipped> I agree.
> 6) And, from looking at the code, Field+ won't change the sign of a
> zone-shifted numeric field back.
> I think it's a moot point, since pressing Field Enter would truncate
> the sign - Bah! Unless it's
> an FER field.
I think I've experienced this problem, but ignored it. :)
+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To subscribe to this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+---
