On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 05:51:02PM -0500, Scott Klement wrote:
>
> (Here I am replying to myself)
>
> Err... what I actually COULD do, instead of select()ing for both read
> and write in terminal_waitevent, I could just not return from get_byte
> until SSL_read returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ. It might make the ssl
> module a bit "greedy" when a re-negotiation is requested... but it
> would make it possible to keep all the ssl-specific code in the sslstream
> module.
>
> I think I'll do it that way. (I wish I had thought of that earlier)
I wouldn't go through all that trouble to avoid hacking the terminal for a
write FD. We might not get away so easy when/if Linux-SNA and SNA-Over-IP are
implemented.
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Scott Klement wrote:
>
> >
> > But I would... because of the write fds... though, it'd probably work
> > "most of the time," if I didn't... :)
> >
>
-Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice
_______________________________________________
This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list
To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250
or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
