Hello, I'm interested in looking at Cobol, and a friend of mine who is a Cobol programmer (but not a very avid computer user in general) gave me a QIC-2GB tape with some cobol examples on it. I have an AS/400 running (and connected using tn5250 to my linux machine) OS/400v3r2 that should be able to mount the tape, but I can't figure out the tape device's name, and neither can my friend because she used System36 and not OS/400. If anyone can help me or point me to some documentation I'd be grateful - I plan on using Linux and also tinycobol once I can access these programs.
Thanks in advance, Brandon Barker On Thursday 25 October 2001 03:10 pm, you wrote: > Send Tiny-cobol-users mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tiny-cobol-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Tiny-cobol-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Cobol-Syntax (Fred Mobach) > 2. Re: Function keys patch (David Essex) > 3. RE: Library DB configure (was: [ANN] > tinycobol-0.54-6bw_rh71.i386.rpm) (shurrell) 4. Re: NIST validation test > suite (Bernard Giroud) > 5. Re: Function keys patch (Ferran Pegueroles) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 21:41:43 +0200 > From: Fred Mobach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Systemhouse Mobach bv > To: tiny-cobol-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Cobol-Syntax > > Standard-User fuer Alfred wrote: > > ** Points and periods > > just remember me: ten years ago i learned Cobol-85 on MS-Cobol IV. > > This compiler was strongly flagged to Ans85 and so the trace after > > performing into a paragraph got a obscured reaction, if a period was > > mistakely set within a paragraph. The first period in a paragraph was > > interpreted as a "RETURN TO SENDER". Thats fact and we spent a lot of > > time searching and deleting these errors. > > I don't dare to refute this. But then, it's an error in the compiler. No > need I think to recall what other have stated already on this topic ? > > Regards, > > Fred _______________________________________________ This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
