On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 00:42, Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice wrote: > I'm surprised lp5250d.c and scs2ascii.c are not on the list. Basically the > idea was to put the library source under LGPL but the actual programs under > GPL.
I think this would be ideal. It needs to be easy to ship binaries without violating any licenses. http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/download.html I'd like to see tn5250 on that list some day, not to mention that some Linux distributions (SuSE for iSeries) already ship it (I believe). Would it be possible to get agreement from everyone to switch to the above licensing scheme? I'd be willing to mod the RPM .spec file so that libtn5250 and tn5250 packages are generated separately, if needed. -- Steve Fox IBM Linux Technology Center http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc http://k-lug.org _______________________________________________ This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
