Re: [LINUX5250] g_malloc and malloc

[James Rich]

Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
Hi

There are many inconsistencies in memory allocation usage. Memory is often
> allocated with malloc() and deallocated with g_free() or the inverse. Is
someone currently looking at this or should I submit a patch (convert
> everything to glib), which represents many files?

I wonder if there are some inconsistencies between the 0.16 branch and 
CVS HEAD, since the branch doesn't use glib and HEAD does.  Are you sure 
you don't have a mix of files?  g_free won't compile in the 0.16 branch 
since glib isn't linked in, so I assume you're talking about CVS HEAD. 
If there are inconsistencies in HEAD, I'd say send a patch.

James Rich

_______________________________________________
This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list
To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250
or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.