Hola:

Sean, did you try removing tcp/ip and network interface from the Windows conf. and let XP rebuild them on its own ?

--
    Venezuela, the most beautiful pearl in the Caribbean




From: "Sean Dembrosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Craziness with Win XP Pro
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 12:53:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [165.121.87.27]
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mc2-f20.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.27]) by mc2-s4.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:07:09 -0700
Received: from ns3.biznetindia.com ([203.200.89.83]) by mc2-f20.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:06:25 -0700
Received: from ns3.biznetindia.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by ns3.biznetindia.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h79H5ccT002642(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:35:38 +0530
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by ns3.biznetindia.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h79H5K9f002620;Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:35:20 +0530
X-Message-Info: 0jbW5ANosZKhuDT1KCp1ozdgtNGVtS7Z
Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:35:20 +0530
X-Authentication-Warning: ns3.biznetindia.com: listserv set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Aug 2003 16:53:50.0816 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF0A2600:01C35E96]
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/657
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks everyone for the help so far...

Tried turning off McAffee, gave no real change to the situation. Changed cabling to the NIC, and now I'm sure it's not a link layer problem, definitely something within either the protocol or application layer... Yeah, there's a firewall on the linux box, but it's open to the LAN, and nothing has changed there for months, so not sure it's a variable worth digging into...

One strange error message tha may shed some light on this subject... Within Win XP Pro, from a cmd prompt, typing 'ipconfig /renew' gives the following error:

"
WINDOWS IP CONFIGURATION

An error occured while renewing interface Local Area Connection : An operation was attempted on something that was not a socket
"


Strange stuff, I'd say. Googled for it, and it seems it's an issue with "protection" programs inserting themselves into your net stack to intercept god knows what, I guess tcp packets :) I"m going to try working from this angle and give feedback as to success/failure in a week when I can return to this problem.

Thanks all for help thus far for a problem so stupid and annoying on an OS that's so annoying...
Sean


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail




Reply via email to