El vie, 27-05-2005 a las 11:09, Giampaolo Carmagnani escribió: [...]
> Lamentablemente tengo información contradictoria com respecto al assunto > http://idgnow.uol.com.br/AdPortalv5/ComputacaoPessoalInterna.aspx?GUID=BD795619-ABB3-41D2-8C4B-CF4BE9676A58&ChannelID=2000014 > (en portugues). > > Será que alguién me puede corrigir? bueno, la misma noticia pero en ingles: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=21761 ojo con -> "MICROSOFT said that the famous upcoming Star Wars Episode III, Revenge of the sith was rendered on beta version in Windows 64 bit." pero suena extraño que en ILM usen una version beta para hacer una pelicula... ;) ahora si revisas: http://blogs.msdn.com/mszcool/archive/2004/08/16/215059.aspx hay un comentario un poco mas cuerdo: "not too sure if that's the final rendering...from the article it looks like before & after touchups and conceptual stuff. iirc, Industrial Light & Magic do the heavy lifting for the actual scenes, can't see George outsourcing that to a third party like JAK. ILM runs a huge Linux renderfarm...if ILM has converted over, that would be definitely be a big win for MS. interesting...but unlikely at presnet. windows XP doesn't have the huge cluster HPC features that you'd need to render the entire movie. although microsoft is entering that area..." -- Ricardo Mun~oz A. Usuario Linux #182825 (counter.li.org)
