On 11/11/10 13:05, Juan Andres Ramirez wrote: > 2010/11/11 Enrique Herrera Noya <[email protected]> > >> >> On 11/11/10 09:45, Juan Andres Ramirez wrote: >>> Estimados, sigo con el asunto, pero ahora(despues de empesar todo de >> nuevo, >>> en las config) me aparece un mensaje de error en los logs de la maquina >> que >>> hace de server nfs: >>> >>> authenticated mount request from 192.168.100.70:715 for >>> /mnt/Respaldos_virtuales (/mnt/Respaldos_virtuales) >>> Nov 11 09:33:14 mountd[6946]: Cannot export /mnt/Respaldos_virtuales, >>> possibly unsupported filesystem or fsid= required >>> >>> He estado buscando, pero tengo el paquete ntfs-3g que da soporte al >> sistema >>> de archivos ntfs, lo de fsid no encuentro una respuesta a eso. >>> >>> >> ve que paquetes tienes instalados asociados a ntfs >> deberia haber un >> fuse-ntfs-3g >> fuse >> ntfs-tools o algo asi >> > Tengo los siguientes paquetes, en un Centos 5.3: > > fuse > ntfs-3g > ntfsprogs (ntfsprogs.x86_64 : NTFS filesystem libraries and utilities) > nfs-utils > nfs4-acl-tools > jum centos 5.3 puedes actualizar a 5.4 y luego a 5.5 ?
que kernel es? has actualizado el kernel? > > >> >> lo otro has probado con no_root_squash? (dado que la particion es ntfs y >> no ext3 o alguna de gnu/linux) >> >>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Enrique Herrera Noya < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/11/10 10:42, Juan Andres Ramirez wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Enrique Herrera Noya < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/11/10 10:09, Juan Andres Ramirez wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Marcos Ramirez <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:20 -0300, Juan Andres Ramirez wrote: >>>>>>>>> /etc/exports >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /mnt/Respaldos_virtuales >>>>>>>> 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0(rw,sync,root_squash)< >>>>>> http://192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0%28rw,sync,root_squash%29> >>>>>>>> Intenta con >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /mnt/Respaldos_virtuales 192.168.100.*(rw,sync,root_squash) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ya lo probé y no pasa nada. >>>>>>>> Otrosi, tu hosts.allow no tiene ningun efecto si no tienes un >>>>>>>> "ALL:ALL" (o equivalente) en tu hosts.deny >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> En mi hosts.deny: >>>>>>> portmap:ALL >>>>>>> >>>>>> y en tu hosts.allow >>>>>> tienes >>>>>> portmap: 192.168.100. >>>>>> mountd: 192.168.100. >>>>>> >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>> Mi hosts.allow: >>>>> portmap:192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 >>>>> rpc.nfsd:192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 >>>>> nfs:192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 >>>>> mountd:192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> respalda tu hosts.allow >>>> y dejalo así >>>> >>>> portmap: 192.168.100. >>>> nfsd: 192.168.100. >>>> mountd: 192.168.100. >>>> >>>> y me dices >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> deberian estar si o si >>>>>> por que si no tu hosts.deny agarra todas las redes sin excluir >>>>>> 192.168.100.* >>>>>> >>>>> Mi hosts.deny: >>>>> portmap:ALL >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Saludos >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Marcos Ramirez <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Documento PUBLICO >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
