On May 14, 2015 6:18 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> wrote: ." > > i never knew this, but that makes it even *more* confusing as it > suggests there should be all 465 tag entries under .git/refs/tags/, > no? so how do i interpret those lonely three tag names in refs/tags? >
Sort of like objects, tags are "packed" into a single file regularly, to avoid lots of files/inodes... _______________________________________________ Linux mailing list [email protected] http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux
