2013/11/15 Jonas Bonn <jo...@southpole.se> > On 11/15/2013 11:22 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> This should probably be "altera,de0_nano". We also need to put a version >>> >> >> "terasic,de0_nano"? The board says "Designed and manufactured by Terasic". >> Hmm, the sticker on the box says "Altera DE0-Nano". >> > > Good question... > > > terasic makes more sense than Altera. Altera just provides one of the components on the board
> >>> Version number needed. OpenCores wanted "projectname-rtlsvn###" where >>> ### >>> is the SVN commit number of the RTL directory in the project's source >>> repository. >>> >> >> That's gonna need some information diving, as Stefan's orpsoc git >> repositories >> only contains references to orpsocv2 git-svn-ids, not the svn ids of >> the original >> component repositories. >> > > Stefan? Where's the "official" home of these cores nowadays? Have they > been modified since they were copied from OpenCores into orpsocv2? > > Most cores are fetched directly from OpenCores SVN. Out of these, some are patched on the fly by ORPSoC before they are being built. Most of the new cores are only available on github More generally, can Linux use out-of-tree DTS files in an easy way? It's handy to have them in the kernel, but the best fit might actually be to put them in the corresponding orpsocv3 system directory. That would also make it easier to have separate device trees for differently configured FPGAs (they are reprogrammable after all). //Olof
_______________________________________________ Linux mailing list Linux@lists.openrisc.net http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/linux
