Micro$oft has been up several times with anti-monopoly. I am thinking here because of their "security invention" it may infringe upon the computer manufacturers themselves this time - as opposed to softwares - as to locking out other computer operating systems from operating without their security key in fact in a dual boot preference by the purchaser of a personal computer - which of course is free enterprise. Like trade restriction and so on. Like mentioned, someone will launch a work around no doubt. In other words, I am seeing this as an unlawful trade restraint in some fashion technically, and arguable naturally.
------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, please email [email protected] & you will be removed.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LINUX_Newbies/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
