And also I have tested different packet size , I found odd len packet can't response, even can. for example:
ping -s 122 192.12.11.1 0% lost
ping -s 123 192.12.11.1 100% lost
thanks
zhu
ollie lho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 22:30, zhu shi song wrote:
> I met one strange error on sis900 ethernet driver.
> I'm using cvs freebios on 6 Oct, 2002 , kernel 2.4.17,
> mainboard is winfast6300. After booting using
> linuxbios stored in DOC, I boot
> my host linux system using normal bios. the host
> linux
> is the same system as in DOC. I test pings, the
> result
> is ( after linuxbios booting):
> ping -s 2592 192.12.11.1 ( remote ip addr ) 0% lost
> ping -s 2593 192.12.11.1 ( remote ip addr ) no
> response, 100% lost
Why are your using a packet size of 259x bytes ?? It just makes
no sense since the MTU of ethernet is about 1500.
> I can't make the mainboard work correctly until I have
> booted
> windows98. Then I use my host linux system to boot,
> the thing is ok. (after windows98 b! ooting )
> ping -s 2592 192.12.11.1 0% lost
> ping -s 2593 192.12.11.1 0% lost
>
> What's the problem, maybe something wrong with pci
> ,or sis900 init
> code.
Some early 630A/E chips has some kind of bugs due to semiconductor
fab process. Probably you are just unlucky to get a bad one.
Ollie
_______________________________________________
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more
faith.yahoo.com
