On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote: > gcc 2.96 is not a real release, more of a redhat branch off the 3.0 dev tree > that gnu disavows. There are notes somewhere about this but I couldn't > quickly find the link. I would consider anything that 2.96 does or does not > do, to be a laboratory curiosity. Can you compile a linux kernel with > either 2.96 or 3.2?
I understand. But linuxbios has worked fine for several years on several platforms with several gcc versions. Something bad has happened in 3.2 which we'll have to figure out. ron _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
