On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, steven james wrote: > That's looking likely, but it seems that 48M are being eaten somewhere > (quite possably SMA). Unless you actually want an SMA that big, it might > be good to look at the registers for SMA using lspci after a LinuxBIOS > boot. You'll probably have to add some code to initialize that/those > registers. It could be that SMA is taking 48M due to an undocumented or > reserved value in the register.
what's odd here is that the memory sizer functions should reduce the memory by the amount of SMA size. _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
